Despite having my misconceptions about the book corrected, after completing Las Memorias de Mama Blanca I still did not like the book all that much. While I think the writing is creative (although somewhat confusing) in the sense that Parra is writing in a time period prior to her own reality, I was never able to get into it, and I was never all that interested in what she was saying. I found Cumanda to be much more interesting for the fact that there was a lot of action and suspense. There was a purpose to keep reading in the sense that I wanted to find out what would happen to the characters in the end. In Las Memorias de Mama Blanca I did not feel this way at all. Unfortunately, I was just waiting for it to be over.
The relationships between the members of the family were somewhat interesting, but I never felt like as a reader you came to know every character all that well (especially all of the sisters). In addition, the commentaries surrounding the differences between the roles of males and females was somewhat interesting as well, but personally it is a somewhat tired theme. It may have been entirely relevant to the time in which the book was written, but from an academic perspective this is a theme I have gone over numerous times, and it becomes slightly old. One thing that I did find interesting was that although there were not too many male characters, when they did come up in the book they would be given entire chapters to themselves that went on for some length (e.g. Primo Juancho, Vicente, and Daniel). Perhaps this too is a commentary on the roles and importance of men versus women. I am not sure.
February 4, 2007 at 10:59 pm |
i agree with you. this book seemed to drag on a bit too much for my taste. i thought cumanda was long and tedious but this book made me appreciate the other one more. unfortunetly what can you say about a book that pits genders against each other? either you agree with it or you dont. i think that was the point of the book. but maybe it missed the mark and the point was lost amongst the rest of the detail
February 5, 2007 at 3:44 am |
It’s interesting how tastes can differ. I found I disliked Cumanda for the same reasons you liked it. To me I was simply following a plot, waiting to find out what happened, (and reading because I was forced to) but I could care less about the ending because I could care less about the characters. Instead I find Memorias de Mama Blanca to not be plot driven, but with quirky and interesting characters, and this is much more what I would prefer to read. To each his/her own!
February 5, 2007 at 6:39 am |
I agree with you that at times it was a little lengthy, and not with the same suspense and drama that Cumanda had. However, I enjoyed the anecdotal style of writing – I found it refreshing and comical. I also said the same thing about the sisters – that their characters weren’t really explored all that much.
February 6, 2007 at 12:12 am |
Yes, I think it’s an interesting point that the male characters, though few, are given lengthy sections of the point. Which is why I myself don’t exactly see the novel as “pit[ting] genders against each other.” Nadya, say more!
February 6, 2007 at 12:16 am |
Hey Kerry -
You make a good observation about how the male characters aren’t really woven into the story but instead have entire chapters dedicated to them in isolation. I think this relates to the idea we were talking about in class about this being a completely female world – other than the shadowy figure of the father in the background the only permanent characters are the sisters and their female caretakers. With the men appering each in a single chapter it emphasizes the isolation of these experiences, like characters in a play who come on stage for a single scene.
February 6, 2007 at 1:42 am |
Um, by “lengthy sections of the point” I probably meant “lengthy sections of the book.”
Apologies!
February 7, 2007 at 8:10 am |
That is very interesting observation. I did not see the connection between lengthy sections of the book describing male characters as placing importance on men. Thanks for point that out!
February 7, 2007 at 5:18 pm |
I agree with you. I didn’t really enjoy the book. I don;t mind reading it for class but I wouldn’t read it for my own entertainment. This leads me to ask myself what is good literature?? Something well written? Or does personal taste has something to do with it?